↓ Skip to main content

Mathematical modeling of fed-batch butanol fermentation with simultaneous pervaporation

Overview of attention for article published in Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, November 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Mathematical modeling of fed-batch butanol fermentation with simultaneous pervaporation
Published in
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, November 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02706028
Authors

Chang-Ho Park, Charles Q. Geng

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 23%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 38%
Chemical Engineering 2 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Chemistry 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2013.
All research outputs
#7,562,072
of 23,067,276 outputs
Outputs from Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
#65
of 401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,822
of 29,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,067,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 401 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them