↓ Skip to main content

Probing the role of N-linked glycans in the stability and activity of fungal cellobiohydrolases by mutational analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cellulose, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Probing the role of N-linked glycans in the stability and activity of fungal cellobiohydrolases by mutational analysis
Published in
Cellulose, June 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10570-009-9305-1
Authors

William S. Adney, Tina Jeoh, Gregg T. Beckham, Yat-Chen Chou, John O. Baker, William Michener, Roman Brunecky, Michael E. Himmel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 71 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 27%
Researcher 15 21%
Other 7 10%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 23%
Engineering 6 8%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 13 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,562,072
of 23,067,276 outputs
Outputs from Cellulose
#251
of 916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,749
of 111,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellulose
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,067,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 916 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.