| Title |
A new binderless thick-film piezoelectric paste
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10854-007-9275-8 |
| Authors |
Darryl P. J. Cotton, Paul H. Chappell, Andy Cranny, Neil M. White |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 50% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 5 | 42% |
| Engineering | 3 | 25% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,562,072
of 23,067,276 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics
#111
of 637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,592
of 72,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,067,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 637 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.