| Title |
Training clinicians in how to use patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quality of Life Research, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11136-014-0903-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria J. Santana, Lotte Haverman, Kate Absolom, Elena Takeuchi, David Feeny, Martha Grootenhuis, Galina Velikova |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 40% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 20% |
| Portugal | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 239 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 16% |
| Researcher | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 20% |
| Unknown | 60 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 16% |
| Psychology | 19 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 12% |
| Unknown | 71 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,151,266
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#761
of 2,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,288
of 379,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#7
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,847 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.