| Title |
Relationship between cell size, cell cycle and specific recombinant protein productivity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Cell Science, October 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1008103730027 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David R. Lloyd, Paul Holmes, Lee P. Jackson, A. Nicholas Emery, Mohamed Al-Rubeai |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 25% |
| Researcher | 25 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 18% |
| Chemical Engineering | 9 | 8% |
| Engineering | 8 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2014.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Cell Science
#356
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,181
of 38,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Cell Science
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.