↓ Skip to main content

A tsunami of unmet needs: pancreatic and ampullary cancer patients' supportive care needs and use of community and allied health services

Overview of attention for article published in Psycho-Oncology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A tsunami of unmet needs: pancreatic and ampullary cancer patients' supportive care needs and use of community and allied health services
Published in
Psycho-Oncology, June 2015
DOI 10.1002/pon.3887
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanessa L Beesley, Monika Janda, David Goldstein, Helen Gooden, Neil D Merrett, Dianne L O'Connell, Ingrid J Rowlands, David Wyld, Rachel E Neale

Abstract

People diagnosed with pancreatic cancer have the worst survival prognosis of any cancer. No previous research has documented the supportive care needs of this population. Our objective was to describe people's needs and use of support services and to examine whether these differed according to whether or not patients had undergone surgical resection. Queensland pancreatic or ampullary cancer patients (n = 136, 54% of those eligible) completed a survey, which assessed 34 needs across five domains (Supportive Care Needs Survey-Short Form) and use of health services. Differences by resection were compared with Chi-squared tests. Overall, 96% of participants reported having some needs. More than half reported moderate-to-high unmet physical (54%) or psychological (52%) needs, whereas health system/information (32%), patient care (21%) and sexuality needs (16%) were described less frequently. The three most frequently reported moderate-to-high needs included 'not being able to do things they used to do' (41%), 'concerns about the worries of those close' (37%) and 'uncertainty about the future' (30%). Patients with non-resectable disease reported greater individual information needs, but their needs were otherwise similar to patients with resectable disease. Self-reported use of support was low; only 35% accessed information, 28%, 18% and 15% consulted a dietician, complementary medicine practitioner or mental health practitioner, respectively. Palliative care access was greater (59% vs 27%) among those with non-resectable disease. Very high levels of needs were reported by people with pancreatic or ampullary cancer. Future work needs to elucidate why uptake of appropriate supportive care is low and which services are required. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 100 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 12%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 30 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 18%
Social Sciences 10 10%
Psychology 9 9%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 32 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Psycho-Oncology
#990
of 2,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,957
of 277,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psycho-Oncology
#29
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.