| Title |
Degradation of Methylene Blue by RF Plasma in Water
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11090-008-9142-2 |
| Authors |
T. Maehara, I. Miyamoto, K. Kurokawa, Y. Hashimoto, A. Iwamae, M. Kuramoto, H. Yamashita, S. Mukasa, H. Toyota, S. Nomura, A. Kawashima |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 34% |
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 14 | 30% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 21% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 13% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing
#52
of 208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,796
of 84,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them