↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis and Classification of Systemic Sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosis and Classification of Systemic Sclerosis
Published in
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12016-010-8198-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric Hachulla, David Launay

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 160 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Student > Master 21 13%
Other 14 8%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 49 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 54 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,967,425
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#327
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,309
of 172,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.