| Title |
Usefulness of B-type natriuretic peptide in elderly patients with acute dyspnea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, October 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-004-2469-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick Ray, Martine Arthaud, Yannick Lefort, Sophie Birolleau, Catherine Beigelman, Bruno Riou, the EPIDASA Study Group |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 32% |
| Researcher | 6 | 16% |
| Professor | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 81% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2016.
All research outputs
#4,767,910
of 23,067,276 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,300
of 5,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,270
of 62,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,067,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.