| Title |
Construction and characterization of a normalized cDNA library of Nannochloropsis oculata (Eustigmatophyceae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ADS, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00343-010-9924-2 |
| Authors |
Jianzhong Yu, Xiaolei Ma, Kehou Pan, Guanpin Yang, Wengong Yu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 27% |
| Researcher | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 20% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2017.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#3,582
of 25,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,361
of 103,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#38
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.