↓ Skip to main content

Increased noise trauma in guinea pigs through magnesium deficiency

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, October 1982
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
12 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Increased noise trauma in guinea pigs through magnesium deficiency
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, October 1982
DOI 10.1007/bf00454034
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Ising, M. Handrock, T. Günther, R. Fischer, M. Dombrowski

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#282
of 3,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#875
of 7,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,481 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them