| Title |
Development of the oxygenator: past, present, and future
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Artificial Organs, September 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10047-004-0268-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hidehiko Iwahashi, Koichi Yuri, Yukihiko Nosé |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 135 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 12% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 44 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,768,617
of 23,067,276 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Artificial Organs
#24
of 247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,888
of 59,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Artificial Organs
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,067,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 247 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them