| Title |
Relationships between the electroretinogram a-wave, b-wave and oscillatory potentials and their application to clinical diagnosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Documenta Ophthalmologica, June 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00156572 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Husam Asi, Ido Perlman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 24% |
| Researcher | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 10% |
| Engineering | 5 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#76
of 485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,634
of 18,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 485 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them