| Title |
Biotechnological production of pyruvic acid
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, November 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s002530100804 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Y. Li, J. Chen, S.-Y. Lun |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 23% |
| Engineering | 24 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 16 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 11% |
| Chemical Engineering | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,022,830
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2,748
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,098
of 45,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#25
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.