↓ Skip to main content

An assessment of the UK inpatient care for heart failure patients with diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An assessment of the UK inpatient care for heart failure patients with diabetes
Published in
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, May 2018
DOI 10.1177/1474515118777412
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lihua Wu, Jackie Cleator, Mamas Mamas, Christi Deaton

Abstract

Diabetes is a common co-morbidity for patients with heart failure. Diabetes as a co-morbidity means that inpatient care should focus on both conditions to maximize the treatment regimen. However, this pressing issue is not widely researched and so it is unclear whether the acute care management needs of these patients are being met. (1) To assess the differences in the number of hospital readmissions between patients with heart failure and patients with heart failure-diabetes; (2) to assess the use of integrated care approach for patients with heart failure-diabetes during the index heart failure-related admission; (3) to explore patient experiences of admissions. A mixed methods design was used: we identified heart failure-related admissions between 1 April 2011 and 31 March 2012 in two hospitals, then reviewed medical records and interviewed 14 patients. Over a 12 month period patients with heart failure-diabetes ( n=172) had more heart failure-related Accident and Emergency attendance episodes (incident rate ratio 1.24, p<0.01) and hospital readmissions (incident rate ratio 1.23, p=0.01) than patients with heart failure ( n=370). We reviewed 72 medical records which met inclusion criteria (adults with heart failure-diabetes, ejection fraction <45%): during admission most of them were reviewed by heart failure specialists but less than one-third were reviewed by diabetes specialists. The interview respondents addressed the need for better integration and co-ordination of care. This is one of the first UK studies to assess the integration of inpatient care for those with heart failure and multi-morbidities. The findings suggest that maximal care management during admission should be explored as a way of reducing the frequent readmissions and improving patient outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 48%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2018.
All research outputs
#19,015,492
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
#745
of 839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,162
of 330,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
#19
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.