↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for the presence of electrotonic depression of pacemakers in the rabbit atrioventricular node. The effects of uncoupling from the surrounding myocardium

Overview of attention for article published in Basic Research in Cardiology, March 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Evidence for the presence of electrotonic depression of pacemakers in the rabbit atrioventricular node. The effects of uncoupling from the surrounding myocardium
Published in
Basic Research in Cardiology, March 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf01907273
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. J. H. J. Kirchhof, F. I. M. Bonke, M. A. Allessie

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2015.
All research outputs
#7,562,072
of 23,067,276 outputs
Outputs from Basic Research in Cardiology
#182
of 652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,695
of 13,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Basic Research in Cardiology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,067,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 652 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them