Title |
Degradation of Organic Cyanides byPseudomonas aeruginosa
|
---|---|
Published in |
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, March 1991
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02922656 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mohamed S. Nawaz, John W. Davis, James H. Wolfram, Kirit D. Chapatwala |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 12% |
Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
Researcher | 2 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 18% |
Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 35% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 18% |
Engineering | 2 | 12% |
Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 2 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2014.
All research outputs
#4,768,617
of 23,067,276 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#197
of 2,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,047
of 17,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,067,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,533 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.