| Title |
Biomimetic Synthesis of Collagen/Nano-Hydroxyapitate Scaffold for Tissue Engineering
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Bionic Engineering, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1672-6529(08)60064-5 |
| Authors |
Chao-zong Liu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 10 | 30% |
| Materials Science | 6 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,562,072
of 23,067,276 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bionic Engineering
#39
of 173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,633
of 80,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bionic Engineering
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,067,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.