| Title |
Design and Fabrication of CD-like Microfluidic Platforms for Diagnostics: Microfluidic Functions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biomedical Microdevices, September 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1011419515576 |
| Authors |
Marc J. Madou, L. James Lee, Sylvia Daunert, Siyi Lai, Chih-Hsin Shih |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 17% |
| Researcher | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 64 | 55% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,799,086
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#53
of 813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,114
of 40,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 813 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them