| Title |
P.psyllium-g-polyacrylamide: Synthesis and characterization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Polymer Bulletin, July 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00289-002-0056-5 |
| Authors |
A. Mishra, S. Rajani, M. Agarwal, R. Dubey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 1 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2010.
All research outputs
#7,562,072
of 23,067,276 outputs
Outputs from Polymer Bulletin
#190
of 860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,312
of 44,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polymer Bulletin
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,067,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 860 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.