You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nursing and Medical Perceptions of a Hospital Rapid Response System
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nursing Care Quality, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1097/ncq.0000000000000139 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clint Douglas, Sonya Osborne, Carol Windsor, Robyn Fox, Catriona Booker, Lee Jones, Glenn Gardner |
| Abstract |
Perhaps no other patient safety intervention depends so acutely on effective interprofessional teamwork for patient survival than the hospital rapid response system. Yet, little is known about nurse-physician relationships when rescuing at-risk patients. This study compared nursing and medical staff perceptions of a mature rapid response system at a large tertiary hospital. Findings indicate that the rapid response system may be failing to address a hierarchical culture and systems-level barriers to early recognition and response to patient deterioration. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 26% |
| Unknown | 20 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,169,181
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nursing Care Quality
#321
of 880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,695
of 315,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nursing Care Quality
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 880 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.