↓ Skip to main content

Group-wise ANOVA simultaneous component analysis for designed omics experiments

Overview of attention for article published in Metabolomics, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Group-wise ANOVA simultaneous component analysis for designed omics experiments
Published in
Metabolomics, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11306-018-1369-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edoardo Saccenti, Age K. Smilde, José Camacho

Abstract

Modern omics experiments pertain not only to the measurement of many variables but also follow complex experimental designs where many factors are manipulated at the same time. This data can be conveniently analyzed using multivariate tools like ANOVA-simultaneous component analysis (ASCA) which allows interpretation of the variation induced by the different factors in a principal component analysis fashion. However, while in general only a subset of the measured variables may be related to the problem studied, all variables contribute to the final model and this may hamper interpretation. We introduce here a sparse implementation of ASCA termed group-wise ANOVA-simultaneous component analysis (GASCA) with the aim of obtaining models that are easier to interpret. GASCA is based on the concept of group-wise sparsity introduced in group-wise principal components analysis where structure to impose sparsity is defined in terms of groups of correlated variables found in the correlation matrices calculated from the effect matrices. The GASCA model, containing only selected subsets of the original variables, is easier to interpret and describes relevant biological processes. GASCA is applicable to any kind of omics data obtained through designed experiments such as, but not limited to, metabolomic, proteomic and gene expression data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 12 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 15%
Mathematics 3 5%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2018.
All research outputs
#5,232,451
of 25,163,238 outputs
Outputs from Metabolomics
#276
of 1,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,384
of 336,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metabolomics
#10
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,163,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.