↓ Skip to main content

Treatment for Sleep Problems in Children with Autism and Caregiver Spillover Effects

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
Title
Treatment for Sleep Problems in Children with Autism and Caregiver Spillover Effects
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10803-015-2507-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Mick Tilford, Nalin Payakachat, Karen A. Kuhlthau, Jeffrey M. Pyne, Erica Kovacs, Jayne Bellando, D. Keith Williams, Werner B. F. Brouwer, Richard E. Frye

Abstract

Sleep problems in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are under-recognized and under-treated. Identifying treatment value accounting for health effects on family members (spillovers) could improve the perceived cost-effectiveness of interventions to improve child sleep habits. A prospective cohort study (N = 224) was conducted with registry and postal survey data completed by the primary caregiver. We calculated quality of life outcomes for the child and the primary caregiver associated with treatments to improve sleep in the child based on prior clinical trials. Predicted treatment effects for melatonin and behavioral interventions were similar in magnitude for the child and for the caregiver. Accounting for caregiver spillover effects associated with treatments for the child with ASD increases treatment benefits and improves cost-effectiveness profiles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 274 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Researcher 28 10%
Student > Bachelor 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 51 18%
Unknown 80 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 52 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 51 18%
Social Sciences 18 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 6%
Unspecified 6 2%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 104 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,002,257
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,264
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,106
of 278,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#25
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.