↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Task Assignment Policies for Supercomputing Servers: The Case for Load Unbalancing and Fairness

Overview of attention for article published in Cluster Computing, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Evaluation of Task Assignment Policies for Supercomputing Servers: The Case for Load Unbalancing and Fairness
Published in
Cluster Computing, April 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:clus.0000018564.05723.a2
Authors

Bianca Schroeder, Mor Harchol-Balter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 55%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 7 64%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 9%
Psychology 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cluster Computing
#72
of 334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,865
of 64,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cluster Computing
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 334 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them