| Title |
Preparation of tricalcium phosphate/calcium pyrophosphate structures via rapid prototyping
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10856-008-3373-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Uwe Gbureck, Tanja Hölzel, Isabell Biermann, Jake E. Barralet, Liam M. Grover |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 25% |
| Researcher | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 18 | 22% |
| Engineering | 16 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,562,072
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#316
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,252
of 157,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.