| Title |
Role of Microglia in Neurotrauma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurotherapeutics, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.nurt.2010.07.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David J. Loane, Kimberly R. Byrnes |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 391 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 380 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 92 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 62 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 13% |
| Researcher | 49 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 59 | 15% |
| Unknown | 52 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 82 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 76 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 8% |
| Engineering | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 48 | 12% |
| Unknown | 71 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,873,876
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#436
of 1,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,856
of 110,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.