↓ Skip to main content

Global justice, capabilities approach and commercial surrogacy in India

Overview of attention for article published in Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Global justice, capabilities approach and commercial surrogacy in India
Published in
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11019-015-9640-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheela Saravanan

Abstract

Inequalities, ineffective governance, unclear surrogacy regulations and unethical practices make India an ideal environment for global injustice in the process of commercial surrogacy. This article aims to apply the 'capabilities approach' to find possibilities of global justice through human fellowship in the context of commercial surrogacy. I draw primarily on my research findings supplemented by other relevant empirical research and documentary films on surrogacy. The paper reveals inequalities and inadequate basic entitlements among surrogate mothers as a consequence of which they are engaged in unjust contracts. Their limited entitlements also limit their opportunities to engage in enriching goals. It is the role of the state to provide all its citizens with basic entitlements and protect their basic human rights. Individuals in India evading their basic duty also contribute to the existing inequalities. Individual responsibilities of the medical practitioners and the intended parents are in question here as they are more inclined towards self-interest rather than commitment towards human fellowship. At the global level, the injustice in transnational commercial surrogacy practices in developing countries calls for an international declaration of women and child rights in third party reproduction with a normative vision of mutual fellowship and human dignity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 21%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 22 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Arts and Humanities 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 24 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,282,766
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
#535
of 593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,591
of 264,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.