You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical Profile, Prognostic Implication, and Response to Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Cardiology, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.031 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Itsik Ben-Dor, Steven A. Goldstein, Augusto D. Pichard, Lowell F. Satler, Gabriel Maluenda, Yanlin Li, Asmir I. Syed, Manuel A. Gonzalez, Michael A. Gaglia, Kohei Wakabayashi, Cedric Delhaye, Loic Belle, Zuyue Wang, Sara D. Collins, Rebecca Torguson, Petros Okubagzi, Adefolaseyi Aderotoye, Zhenyi Xue, William O. Suddath, Kenneth M. Kent, Stephen E. Epstein, Joseph Lindsay, Ron Waksman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 57% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 25 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2012.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Cardiology
#3,773
of 10,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,307
of 194,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Cardiology
#36
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.