↓ Skip to main content

Body matters: rethinking the ethical acceptability of non-beneficial clinical research with children

Overview of attention for article published in Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Body matters: rethinking the ethical acceptability of non-beneficial clinical research with children
Published in
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11019-014-9616-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva De Clercq, Domnita Oana Badarau, Katharina M. Ruhe, Tenzin Wangmo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 16%
Librarian 2 11%
Lecturer 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 26%
Social Sciences 4 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 16%
Psychology 2 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2015.
All research outputs
#15,339,713
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
#378
of 593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,233
of 361,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.