| Title |
Comparison of different MRI techniques for the assessment of thoracic aortic pathology: 3D contrast enhanced MR angiography, turbo spin echo and balanced steady state free precession
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10554-006-9204-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rolf Gebker, Osama Gomaa, Bernhard Schnackenburg, Janina Rebakowski, Eckart Fleck, Eike Nagel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 53% |
| Engineering | 4 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2010.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#351
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,033
of 169,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.