↓ Skip to main content

The effects of land uses on purplish soil erosion in hilly area of Sichuan Province, China

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mountain Science, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
The effects of land uses on purplish soil erosion in hilly area of Sichuan Province, China
Published in
Journal of Mountain Science, March 2005
DOI 10.1007/s11629-005-0068-3
Authors

Gangcai Liu, Jianhui Zhang, Guanglong Tian, Chaofu Wei

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 38%
Environmental Science 2 25%
Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mountain Science
#54
of 221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,970
of 60,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mountain Science
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.