↓ Skip to main content

Time course of calcium absorption in humans: Evidence for a colonic component

Overview of attention for article published in Calcified Tissue International, September 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Time course of calcium absorption in humans: Evidence for a colonic component
Published in
Calcified Tissue International, September 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf02556309
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Janet Barger-Lux, Robert P. Heaney, Robert R. Recker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Lecturer 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Chemistry 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2015.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from Calcified Tissue International
#553
of 1,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,092
of 14,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Calcified Tissue International
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.