| Title |
Cost-Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-013-3103-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lawrence Lee, Monisha Sudarshan, Chao Li, Eric Latimer, Gerald M. Fried, David S. Mulder, Liane S. Feldman, Lorenzo E. Ferri |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Egypt | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 38 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 15% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 60% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,669
of 6,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,500
of 195,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#21
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.