↓ Skip to main content

Hybrid laparoscopic versus open pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: retrospective matched case comparison in 80 patients

Overview of attention for article published in Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Hybrid laparoscopic versus open pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: retrospective matched case comparison in 80 patients
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00423-014-1236-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ulrich Friedrich Wellner, Simon Küsters, Olivia Sick, Caroline Busch, Dirk Bausch, Peter Bronsert, Ulrich Theodor Hopt, Konrad Wojciech Karcz, Tobias Keck

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 19%
Student > Master 5 16%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 8 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 50%
Psychology 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#268
of 1,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,816
of 229,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,151 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.