↓ Skip to main content

Chemotherapy for metastatic disease: review from JCOG trials

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Oncology, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Chemotherapy for metastatic disease: review from JCOG trials
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology, June 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10147-008-0784-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Narikazu Boku

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 67%
Psychology 1 8%
Design 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Oncology
#150
of 923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,814
of 82,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Oncology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 923 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.