↓ Skip to main content

Endoscopic Biliary Sphincterotomy Is Not Required for Transpapillary SEMS Placement for Biliary Obstruction

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Endoscopic Biliary Sphincterotomy Is Not Required for Transpapillary SEMS Placement for Biliary Obstruction
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, July 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10620-010-1317-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikhil Banerjee, Kristen Hilden, Todd H. Baron, Douglas G. Adler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 31%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 73%
Mathematics 1 4%
Unknown 6 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#1,379
of 4,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,191
of 97,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.