↓ Skip to main content

The use of transdermal nicotine in smoking cessation

Overview of attention for article published in Lung, December 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
The use of transdermal nicotine in smoking cessation
Published in
Lung, December 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf02718163
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ph. Müller, Th. Abelin, R. Ehrsam, P. Imhof, H. Howald, D. Mauli

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 33%
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Psychology 1 11%
Social Sciences 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2007.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from Lung
#252
of 894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,999
of 59,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.