You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Conditions in Operating Room and Intensive Care Unit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Anesthesiology, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1097/aln.0000000000002269 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manuel Taboada, Patricia Doldan, Andrea Calvo, Xavier Almeida, Esteban Ferreiroa, Aurora Baluja, Agustin Cariñena, Paula Otero, Valentin Caruezo, Alberto Naveira, Pablo Otero, Julian Alvarez |
| Abstract |
Tracheal intubation is a common intervention in the operating room and in the intensive care unit. The authors hypothesized that tracheal intubation using direct laryngoscopy would be associated with worse intubation conditions and more complications in the intensive care unit compared with the operating room. The authors prospectively evaluated during 33 months patients who were tracheally intubated with direct laryngoscopy in the operating room, and subsequently in the intensive care unit (within a 1-month time frame). The primary outcome was to compare the difference in glottic visualization using the modified Cormack-Lehane grade between intubations performed on the same patient in an intensive care unit and previously in an operating room. Secondary outcomes were to compare first-time success rate, technical difficulty (number of attempts, operator-reported difficulty, need for adjuncts), and the incidence of complications. A total of 208 patients met inclusion criteria. Tracheal intubations in the intensive care unit were associated with worse glottic visualization (Cormack-Lehane grade I/IIa/IIb/III/IV: 116/24/47/19/2) compared with the operating room (Cormack-Lehane grade I/IIa/IIb/III/IV: 159/21/16/12/0; P < 0.001). First-time intubation success rate was lower in the intensive care unit (185/208; 89%) compared with the operating room (201/208; 97%; P = 0.002). Tracheal intubations in the intensive care unit had an increased incidence of moderate and difficult intubation (33/208 [16%] vs. 18/208 [9%]; P < 0.001), and need for adjuncts to direct laryngoscopy (40/208 [19%] vs. 21/208 [10%]; P = 0.002), compared with the operating room. Complications were more common during tracheal intubations in the intensive care unit (76/208; 37%) compared with the operating room (13/208; 6%; P < 0.001). Compared with the operating room, tracheal intubations in the intensive care unit were associated with worse intubation conditions and an increase of complications. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 24% |
| Japan | 6 | 13% |
| Colombia | 2 | 4% |
| Peru | 2 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 69% |
| Scientists | 6 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,136,033
of 25,641,627 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesiology
#392
of 6,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,713
of 342,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesiology
#15
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,641,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.