| Title |
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer disease 2015
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Gastroenterology, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00535-016-1166-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kiichi Satoh, Junji Yoshino, Taiji Akamatsu, Toshiyuki Itoh, Mototsugu Kato, Tomoari Kamada, Atsushi Takagi, Toshimi Chiba, Sachiyo Nomura, Yuji Mizokami, Kazunari Murakami, Choitsu Sakamoto, Hideyuki Hiraishi, Masao Ichinose, Naomi Uemura, Hidemi Goto, Takashi Joh, Hiroto Miwa, Kentaro Sugano, Tooru Shimosegawa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 285 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 21% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 34 | 12% |
| Researcher | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 9% |
| Other | 24 | 8% |
| Other | 46 | 16% |
| Unknown | 67 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 139 | 49% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 36 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Unknown | 69 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2018.
All research outputs
#23,196,437
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastroenterology
#1,128
of 1,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#357,346
of 416,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastroenterology
#24
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.