↓ Skip to main content

Body iron status and gastric cancer risk in the EURGAST study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Cancer, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Body iron status and gastric cancer risk in the EURGAST study
Published in
International Journal of Cancer, July 2015
DOI 10.1002/ijc.29669
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Fonseca-Nunes, Antonio Agudo, Núria Aranda, Victoria Arija, Amanda J Cross, Esther Molina, Maria Jose Sanchez, H B As Bueno-de-Mesquita, Peter Siersema, Elisabete Weiderpass, Vittorio Krogh, Amalia Mattiello, Rosario Tumino, Calogero Saieva, Alessio Naccarati, Bodil Ohlsson, Klas Sjöberg, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Claire Cadeau, Guy Fagherazzi, Heiner Boeing, Annika Steffen, Tilman Kühn, Verena Katzke, Anne Tjønneland, Anja Olsen, Kay-Tee Khaw, Nick Wareham, Tim Key, Yunxia Lu, Elio Riboli, Petra H Peeters, Diana Gavrila, Miren Dorronsoro, José Ramón Quirós, Aurelio Barricarte, Mazda Jenab, Raúl Zamora-Ros, Heinz Freisling, Antonia Trichopoulou, Pagona Lagiou, Christina Bamia, Paula Jakszyn

Abstract

Although it seems biologically plausible for iron to be associated with gastric carcinogenesis, the evidence is insufficient to lead to any conclusions. To further investigate the relationship between body iron status and gastric cancer risk, we conducted a nested case-control study in the multi-centric European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. The study included 456 primary incident gastric adenocarcinoma cases and 900 matched controls that occurred during an average of 11 years of follow-up. We measured pre-diagnostic serum iron, ferritin, transferrin, and C-reactive protein, and further estimated total iron-binding capacity (TIBC) and transferrin saturation (TS). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the risk of gastric cancer by iron metrics were estimated from multivariable conditional logistic regression models. After adjusting for relevant confounders, we observed a statistically significant inverse association between gastric cancer and ferritin and TS indices (ORlog2 =0.80, 95% CI=0.72-0.88; and OR10%increment =0.87, 95% CI=0.78-0.97, respectively). These associations seem to be restricted to noncardia gastric cancer (ferritin showed a P for heterogeneity=0.04 and TS had a P for heterogeneity=0.02), and no differences were found by histological type. TIBC increased risk of overall gastric cancer (OR50µg/dl =1.13, 95% CI=1.02-1.2) and also with noncardia gastric cancer (P for heterogeneity=0.04). Additional analysis suggests that time between blood draw and gastric cancer diagnosis could modify these findings. In conclusion, our results showed a decreased risk of gastric cancer related to higher body iron stores as measured by serum iron and ferritin. Further investigation is needed to clarify the role of iron in gastric carcinogenesis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Professor 2 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 18 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 25 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,901,717
of 24,477,448 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cancer
#4,706
of 12,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,709
of 267,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cancer
#33
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,477,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.