↓ Skip to main content

Principles of fluid management and stewardship in septic shock: it is time to consider the four D’s and the four phases of fluid therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 1,214)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1035 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
16 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
369 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1110 Mendeley
Title
Principles of fluid management and stewardship in septic shock: it is time to consider the four D’s and the four phases of fluid therapy
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13613-018-0402-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manu L. N. G. Malbrain, Niels Van Regenmortel, Bernd Saugel, Brecht De Tavernier, Pieter-Jan Van Gaal, Olivier Joannes-Boyau, Jean-Louis Teboul, Todd W. Rice, Monty Mythen, Xavier Monnet

Abstract

In patients with septic shock, the administration of fluids during initial hemodynamic resuscitation remains a major therapeutic challenge. We are faced with many open questions regarding the type, dose and timing of intravenous fluid administration. There are only four major indications for intravenous fluid administration: aside from resuscitation, intravenous fluids have many other uses including maintenance and replacement of total body water and electrolytes, as carriers for medications and for parenteral nutrition. In this paradigm-shifting review, we discuss different fluid management strategies including early adequate goal-directed fluid management, late conservative fluid management and late goal-directed fluid removal. In addition, we expand on the concept of the "four D's" of fluid therapy, namely drug, dosing, duration and de-escalation. During the treatment of patients with septic shock, four phases of fluid therapy should be considered in order to provide answers to four basic questions. These four phases are the resuscitation phase, the optimization phase, the stabilization phase and the evacuation phase. The four questions are "When to start intravenous fluids?", "When to stop intravenous fluids?", "When to start de-resuscitation or active fluid removal?" and finally "When to stop de-resuscitation?" In analogy to the way we handle antibiotics in critically ill patients, it is time for fluid stewardship.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,035 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 177 16%
Student > Postgraduate 153 14%
Student > Master 92 8%
Student > Bachelor 92 8%
Researcher 86 8%
Other 227 20%
Unknown 283 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 625 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 18 2%
Other 84 8%
Unknown 295 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 596. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#39,291
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#2
of 1,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#831
of 345,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.