↓ Skip to main content

Predicting the probability of successful efficacy of a dissociated agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor from dose–response analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Predicting the probability of successful efficacy of a dissociated agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor from dose–response analysis
Published in
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10928-016-9475-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela J. Conrado, Sriram Krishnaswami, Satoshi Shoji, Sheela Kolluri, Judith Hey-Hadavi, Dorothy McCabe, Ricardo Rojo, Brinda K. Tammara

Abstract

PF-04171327 is a dissociated agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor (DAGR) being developed to retain anti-inflammatory efficacy while reducing unwanted effects. Our aim was to conduct a longitudinal dose-response analysis to identify the DAGR doses with efficacy similar to or greater than prednisone 10 mg once daily (QD). The data included were from a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in 323 subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis on a background of methotrexate. Subjects received DAGR 1, 5, 10 or 15 mg, prednisone 5 or 10 mg, or placebo QD for 8 weeks. The Disease Activity Score 28-4 calculated using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-4 CRP) was the efficacy endpoint utilized in this dose-response model. For DAGR, the maximum effect (Emax) on DAS28-4 CRP was estimated to be -1.2 points (95 % CI -1.7, -0.84), and the evaluated dose range provided 31-87 % of the Emax; for prednisone 5 and 10 mg, the estimated effects were -0.27 (95 % CI -0.55, 0.006) and -0.94 point (95 % CI -1.3, -0.59), respectively. Stochastic simulations indicated that the DAGR 1, 5, 10 and 15 mg have probabilities of 0.9, 29, 54 and 62 %, respectively, to achieve efficacy greater than prednisone 10 mg at week 8. DAGR 9 mg estimated probability was 50 % suggesting that DAGR ≥9 mg QD has an effect on DAS28-4 CRP comparable to or greater than prednisone 10 mg QD. This work informs dose selection for late-stage confirmatory trials.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 30%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 3 6%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 32%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 11 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
#130
of 477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,390
of 327,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 477 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.