↓ Skip to main content

Fate and transport of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in surface waters of agricultural basins

Overview of attention for article published in Pesticide Science, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
234 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fate and transport of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in surface waters of agricultural basins
Published in
Pesticide Science, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/ps.2212
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard H Coupe, Stephen J Kalkhoff, Paul D Capel, Caroline Gregoire

Abstract

Glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] is a herbicide used widely throughout the world in the production of many crops and is heavily used on soybeans, corn and cotton. Glyphosate is used in almost all agricultural areas of the United States, and the agricultural use of glyphosate has increased from less than 10 000 Mg in 1992 to more than 80 000 Mg in 2007. The greatest intensity of glyphosate use is in the midwestern United States, where applications are predominantly to genetically modified corn and soybeans. In spite of the increase in usage across the United States, the characterization of the transport of glyphosate and its degradate aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) on a watershed scale is lacking.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 277 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 58 20%
Student > Master 48 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 14%
Student > Bachelor 31 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 8%
Other 45 16%
Unknown 41 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 90 31%
Environmental Science 66 23%
Chemistry 28 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Engineering 7 2%
Other 34 12%
Unknown 54 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,204,091
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Pesticide Science
#161
of 3,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,370
of 117,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pesticide Science
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.