↓ Skip to main content

Influence of relative humidity on prolonged exercise capacity in a warm environment

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
Title
Influence of relative humidity on prolonged exercise capacity in a warm environment
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00421-011-2206-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronald J. Maughan, Hidenori Otani, Phillip Watson

Abstract

This study examined the influence of relative humidity on endurance exercise performance in a warm environment. Eight male volunteers performed four cycle exercise trials at 70% maximum oxygen uptake until volitional exhaustion in an environmental chamber maintained at 30.2 ± 0.2°C. Volunteers were tested under four relative humidity (rh) conditions: 24, 40, 60 and 80%. Core and weighted mean skin temperature, heart rate, skin blood flow, and cutaneous vascular conductance were recorded at rest and at regular intervals during exercise. Mean ± SD time to exhaustion was 68 ± 19, 60 ± 17, 54 ± 17, and 46 ± 14 min at 24, 40, 60, and 80% rh, respectively (P < 0.001); exercise time was significantly less at 60% (P = 0.013) and 80% (P = 0.005) rh than recorded at 24% rh. There were no differences in core temperature (P = 0.480) and heart rate (P = 0.097) between trials. Core temperature at exhaustion was 39.0 ± 0.3°C at 24, 40, and 60% rh and 39.1 ± 0.3°C at 80% rh (P = 0.159). Mean skin temperature at the point of exhaustion was higher at 80% rh than at 24% rh (P < 0.001). Total sweat loss was similar between trials (P = 0.345), but sweating rate was higher at 60 and 80% rh than at 24% rh (P < 0.001). The results suggest that exercise capacity at moderate intensity in a warm environment is progressively impaired as the relative humidity increases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 209 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 19%
Student > Bachelor 33 15%
Student > Master 29 14%
Researcher 20 9%
Other 10 5%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 41 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 84 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 8%
Engineering 16 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 49 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#779,236
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#229
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,017
of 151,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#7
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.