↓ Skip to main content

Importance of laboratory parameters in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and their relationship with cardiovascular diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Importance of laboratory parameters in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and their relationship with cardiovascular diseases
Published in
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, March 2017
DOI 10.1002/jcla.22199
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tulay Kıvanc, Sevsen Kulaksızoglu, Huseyin Lakadamyalı, Fusun Eyuboglu

Abstract

Ostructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an independent risk factor for the development of cardiovascular events. Platelet activation and inflammation are the mechanisms involved in the association between OSA and cardiovascular disease (CVD). The markers of platelet activation and inflammation are the mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), red cell distribution width (RDW), neutrophil- lymphocyte ratio (NLR). We aimed to define the association of NLR, PLR, RDW, and MPV with the severity of disease and the presence of CVD. This study consisted of 300 patients who were admitted to the sleep laboratory. The patients were classified according to their apnea- hypopnea index (AHI) scores as OSA negative (Group A: AHI<5), mild (Group B: AHI: 5-15), moderate (Group C: AHI=15-30), and severe OSA (Group D: AHI >30). There were no significant differences in the NLR, PLR, and MPV among the groups (P>.05); only RDW differed significantly (P=.04). RDW was significantly higher in patients with than without risk factors for CVD [15.6% (15.4-15.7) vs 15.3% (15.1-15.3), respectively; P=.02]. NLR, PLR, MPV, and RDW are widely available and easily obtained from a routinely performed hemogram. Among these laboratory parameters, only RDW can demonstrate the reverse consequences of OSA-associated comorbidities, because vascular damage due to systemic inflammation is an important underlying mechanism in these diseases. RDW might be used as a marker of the response and patient compliance with continuous positive airway pressure treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 11 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2018.
All research outputs
#19,208,718
of 24,458,924 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
#811
of 1,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,394
of 313,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
#12
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,458,924 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,421 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.