You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A standard protocol for documenting modern and fossil ichnological data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Palaeontology, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/pala.12373 |
| Authors |
Peter L. Falkingham, Karl T. Bates, Marco Avanzini, Matthew Bennett, Emese M. Bordy, Brent H. Breithaupt, Diego Castanera, Paolo Citton, Ignacio Díaz‐Martínez, Jim O. Farlow, Anthony R. Fiorillo, Stephen M. Gatesy, Patrick Getty, Kevin G. Hatala, Jahn J. Hornung, James A. Hyatt, Hendrik Klein, Jens N. Lallensack, Anthony J. Martin, Daniel Marty, Neffra A. Matthews, Christian A. Meyer, Jesper Milàn, Nicholas J. Minter, Novella L. Razzolini, Anthony Romilio, Steven W. Salisbury, Lara Sciscio, Ikuko Tanaka, Ashleigh L. A. Wiseman, L. D. Xing, Matteo Belvedere |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 23% |
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 52% |
| Scientists | 15 | 48% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 46 | 52% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2022.
All research outputs
#553,935
of 25,519,924 outputs
Outputs from Palaeontology
#71
of 1,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,221
of 344,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Palaeontology
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,519,924 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.