↓ Skip to main content

Non-Gaussian Methods for Causal Structure Learning

Overview of attention for article published in Prevention Science, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Non-Gaussian Methods for Causal Structure Learning
Published in
Prevention Science, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11121-018-0901-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shohei Shimizu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 27%
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 9 22%
Engineering 6 15%
Psychology 5 12%
Mathematics 4 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2019.
All research outputs
#16,363,465
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Prevention Science
#786
of 1,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,582
of 347,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Prevention Science
#24
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.