↓ Skip to main content

PACAP Modulates Acetylcholine-Elicited Contractions at Nicotinic Neuromuscular Contacts of the Land Snail

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
PACAP Modulates Acetylcholine-Elicited Contractions at Nicotinic Neuromuscular Contacts of the Land Snail
Published in
Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12031-015-0605-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nóra Krajcs, László Hernádi, Zsolt Pirger, Dóra Reglődi, Gábor Tóth, Tibor Kiss

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the potentiating effect of PACAP27 on cholinergic neuromuscular transmission in the recently discovered flexor muscles of the land snail, Helix pomatia. Using immunohistochemistry, we show that PACAP and PAC1 receptors are present in nerve fibers innervating the flexor muscles but not in the muscle itself. We also observed that PACAP27 exerts both pre- and postsynaptic effects on the cholinergic synapse and performed tests using a broad spectrum of chemicals in order to explore the possible intracellular pathways through which PACAP mediates its stimulatory effect. Our pharmacological data demonstrate that PACAP27 presynaptically enhances the release of acetylcholine by activating the adenylate cyclase-cAMP-PKA pathway. Postsynaptically, PACAP27 was found to enhance muscle contractility by PKC-mediated signaling pathway resulting in an increased Ca(2+) release from intracellular stores. These findings suggest that regulation of Ca(2+) release may contribute to the stimulatory effect of PACAP. Our data are the first demonstration of the potentiating effect of PACAP27 at the molluscan excitatory neuromuscular contact.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Researcher 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 40%
Neuroscience 2 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#1,156
of 1,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,288
of 276,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#20
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,643 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.