↓ Skip to main content

Non-classical MHC-Ι genes in chronic hepatitis B and hepatocellular carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Immunogenetics, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Non-classical MHC-Ι genes in chronic hepatitis B and hepatocellular carcinoma
Published in
Immunogenetics, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00251-011-0580-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jian Zhang, Lelin Pan, Luyan Chen, Xiaowen Feng, Lin Zhou, Shusen Zheng

Abstract

The non-classical human leukocyte antigens (HLA)-E, HLA-G, and HLA-F have been shown to modulate immune responses. We examined whether non-classical HLA polymorphisms are associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Fifteen Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in these non-classical class I alleles were investigated by ligase detection reaction. A fragment of 650 bp located in the 3' untranslated region of HLA-G was investigated. Four SNPs (rs17875380, rs41557518, rs114465251, and rs115492845) were associated with altered susceptibility to HBV or HCC, and HLA-F*01:04, HLA-G*01:05N, and HLA-E*01:01 were associated with hepatitis B or hepatitis B complicated with HCC. Six of 16 designated HLA-E, -G, and -F haplotypes were associated with risk of hepatitis B or HCC. Our study provides healthy reference and detailed analyses of non-classical HLA class Ι polymorphisms that provide insight into immune mechanisms involved in susceptibility to hepatitis B and HCC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 30%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Other 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2023.
All research outputs
#6,615,081
of 23,392,375 outputs
Outputs from Immunogenetics
#275
of 1,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,527
of 141,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunogenetics
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,392,375 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,211 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.