| Title |
Physiological and methodological considerations for the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-010-1502-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicola A. Maffiuletti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 71% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 724 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 711 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 134 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 92 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 11% |
| Researcher | 73 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 34 | 5% |
| Other | 138 | 19% |
| Unknown | 171 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 130 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 126 | 17% |
| Engineering | 83 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 75 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 33 | 5% |
| Other | 81 | 11% |
| Unknown | 196 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,866,293
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,749
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,402
of 103,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#14
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.